From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91E5F7EE80
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 03:37:10 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=203.206.230.162;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com";
  x-sender="mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com designates 203.206.230.162 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=203.206.230.162;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com";
  x-sender="mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@hendrix.mega-nerd.net) identity=helo;
  client-ip=203.206.230.162;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@hendrix.mega-nerd.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAM8GUVHLzuai/2dsb2JhbABDxAOBCBZ0gh8BAQEDATpECwtGPRqIJwWyIpALjx8WgyoDlmaQKF2DHig
X-IPAS-Result: Av8EAM8GUVHLzuai/2dsb2JhbABDxAOBCBZ0gh8BAQEDATpECwtGPRqIJwWyIpALjx8WgyoDlmaQKF2DHig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,909,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="7817476"
Received: from hendrix.mega-nerd.net ([203.206.230.162])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2013 03:37:09 +0100
Received: from rollins.mnn (pharoah-vpn [10.9.8.2])
	by hendrix.mega-nerd.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 47044106DDD
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:37:04 +1100 (EST)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:37:03 +1100
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-Id: <20130326133703.6b092cded9e0a8d3c71fd5b7@mega-nerd.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF1Sy-F2fFGq-8+dL_TUsTX70Qew6v62vW9gh0RoV1rRNhvoKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fa.e3jKyg6bl9+vTkPgypQ4ZRzEoos@ifi.uio.no>
	<86572c5b-3307-4f6f-be0b-c710b6291780@googlegroups.com>
	<CAF1Sy-F2fFGq-8+dL_TUsTX70Qew6v62vW9gh0RoV1rRNhvoKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: caml-list@inria.fr
Organization: Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml

Kristopher Micinski wrote:

> Although I haven't personally used it, Camlp4 is nice (and used by
> research) for implementing language extensions.  I'm not sure that GHC
> is quite as hackable / extensible, but maybe that's just because I'm
> uninformed about Haskell :-)..

I suspect that Template Haskell is probably very near to Camlp4 in
terms of capabilities. Its also relatively widely used, for instance
in the Yesod web framework.

Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/