From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rixed@happyleptic.org>
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650CC7EE20
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:21:47 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=pra;
  client-ip=213.251.171.101;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=213.251.171.101;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@eneide.happyleptic.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=213.251.171.101;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@eneide.happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnkHAMCypFDV+6tl/2dsb2JhbABEhVaGG7dYgQiCHwEFOk8LRhQNGzSHeQMTsjwNiVSLSGkKgnuCRmEDlCeBVIszhRGCcA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,255,1352070000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="162545413"
Received: from eneide.happyleptic.org ([213.251.171.101])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 15 Nov 2012 10:20:43 +0100
Received: from extranet.securactive.net ([82.240.34.113] helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan)
	by eneide.happyleptic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>)
	id 1TYvco-0000m0-9i
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:20:42 +0100
Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>)
	id 1TYvcj-0007Ri-75
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:20:37 +0100
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:20:37 +0100
From: rixed@happyleptic.org
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20121115092037.GC26744@securactive.lan>
References: <fa.38rAsBvHd+quECbtcbTH9HW+J6U@ifi.uio.no>
 <fa.YCrkHurCi6yY5s0Qg1r6uLWNQdY@ifi.uio.no>
 <fa.oeqp0ymFFL+o76ut/LjBeQhUcjQ@ifi.uio.no>
 <fa.pEDV80ILnW8x1YQyKuF3NBsK3Kw@ifi.uio.no>
 <fa.LQofvqHUt8xj1kM1rvmQZF+Z7rw@ifi.uio.no>
 <838ab953-d33f-42d5-a363-050217c1b883@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <838ab953-d33f-42d5-a363-050217c1b883@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Preferred layout for new packages

-[ Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:13:58AM -0800, vincent.hugot@gmail.com ]----
> I for one like the (short-)tests-as-comments approach: being near the
> function, they serve as short specifications, and being comments, they don't
> alter the compilation process in the least.

The only drawback I saw is that adding or modifying a test triggers the
recompilation of the whole unit when using makefiles (since the file changed).
I wonder if there exist a tool that's able to find out that since only comments
where changed the module need not be recompiled. Maybe omake can do this ?