From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 902A27ED1A for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 19:11:47 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoKAIKNsk9QRFuw/2dsb2JhbABEsl8DgR+BB4JWP08mKCGIJbsMhVNEhWaEPGMElXyQQYJq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,595,1330902000"; d="scan'208";a="158513299" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 15 May 2012 19:11:46 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SULHk-00041j-Qk; Tue, 15 May 2012 18:11:44 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:11:44 +0100 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" To: caml-list Cc: Benedikt Meurer Message-ID: <20120515171144.GC18493@annexia.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: [Caml-list] Anyone using Benedikt Meurer's new ARM code generator? We recently put bmeurer's new ARM backend into Fedora/ARM, and generally it works well. However (very very occasionally) I'm getting odd segfaults from programs. One example is in camomile 0.8.3 during compilation: ocamlopt.opt -noassert -I internal -I public -I toolslib -I . -o mappings/gen_mappings.opt bigarray.cmxa str.cmxa toolslib.cmxa mappings/gen_mappings.cmx cd mappings && ./gen_mappings.opt /bin/sh: line 1: 13996 Illegal instruction ./gen_mappings.opt make: *** [mappings/cns11643.mar] Error 132 Another is in libguestfs (in the virt-sysprep program, but it seems to be a problem in the generated bindings). I'm not sure this is the same problem as in camomile. I'd just like to compare notes with anyone else using the new backend. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat