From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q32ADwwk031776
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:13:58 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EANd6eU9QRFuw/2dsb2JhbABEuQWBB4IJAQEFOj8QCxgcEhQoIYgguXiFTYpsYwSVYJAwgmg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,355,1330902000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="138676343"
Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 02 Apr 2012 12:13:53 +0200
Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rich@annexia.org>)
	id 1SEeGm-0000MQ-Fj; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:13:52 +0100
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:13:52 +0100
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rich@annexia.org>
To: Hans Ole Rafaelsen <hrafaelsen@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20120402101352.GA1370@annexia.org>
References: <CALs4vDYGKNiYQZLDRVbBWDZibEXeU8T33Bw08G9xAT_-T-6h9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120401195733.GB15870@annexia.org>
 <CALs4vDbKf3Wgd_nyxEXDwWxDQ4j42gSSWM2aDzR05im+K3TPhQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALs4vDbKf3Wgd_nyxEXDwWxDQ4j42gSSWM2aDzR05im+K3TPhQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Strategies for finding memory leaks


On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 10:15:02AM +0200, Hans Ole Rafaelsen wrote:
> However, the application still consumes more and more CPU time. And it
> seems to happen in the GC. Apart from that, the application seems to be
> just fine. So it seems to be something in our code (or in LablGTK) that is
> making the GC spend more and more time. Anyone experienced this kind of
> problem?

You're not swapping are you?  (Run 'vmstat 1' & look at the si/so columns)

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones
Red Hat