From: oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] is there a more concise way to write this?
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:42:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120120144212.GB3591@siouxsie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F197343.8070704@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 08:59:31AM -0500, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 04:38 AM, oliver wrote:
> >More concise does not always mean better readable or more performant.
> >You apply the same kind of selection for both values.
>
> I can't measure readability, but I did throw together a quick
> benchmark to test the different methods. Please take no offense at
> this - I'm sure that the responses were headed much more towards
> readability than performance,
Thats not offending, the result is fine for me. :-)
I preferred the pattern-match version, because I like
things to be displayed in tables. ;-)
My version (option type and folding on lists) you did not implemented, but
maybe it would have been my work to do that.
But I liked the pattern macthing way.
That it also is the fastest way, is a fine result. :-)
I hope you used more than one call of the function and
used average / stddev on your values to get reliable results...
I don't know your Bench-module.
Where is it from?
Ciao,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-20 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 6:38 Martin DeMello
2012-01-20 6:46 ` Valentin ROBERT
2012-01-20 6:58 ` Martin DeMello
2012-01-20 8:37 ` David Allsopp
2012-01-20 13:29 ` Edgar Friendly
2012-01-20 13:50 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2012-01-20 13:58 ` oliver
2012-01-20 14:05 ` Edgar Friendly
2012-01-20 14:12 ` David Allsopp
2012-01-20 14:23 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2012-01-20 14:23 ` Edgar Friendly
2012-01-20 8:37 ` Sebastien Ferre
2012-01-20 9:11 ` Jerome Vouillon
2012-01-20 9:34 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2012-01-20 10:27 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2012-01-20 8:52 ` Lin
2012-01-20 9:08 ` Valentin ROBERT
2012-01-20 9:19 ` Lin
2012-01-20 10:21 ` Martin DeMello
2012-01-20 9:38 ` oliver
2012-01-20 13:59 ` Edgar Friendly
2012-01-20 14:42 ` oliver [this message]
2012-01-20 15:31 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2012-01-20 21:04 ` oliver
2012-01-20 21:09 ` oliver
2012-01-20 20:40 ` oliver
2012-01-20 21:07 ` Martin DeMello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120120144212.GB3591@siouxsie \
--to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=thelema314@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox