From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p7TBnN42002826 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:49:23 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvoAANJ7W05V2gB5nGdsb2JhbABCqBIBAQEBAQgLCQkUJYFAAQEFeRALDjgUKCGIB7grDoVeYASkJQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,296,1312149600"; d="scan'208";a="106944287" Received: from emailfrontal2.citycable.ch ([85.218.0.121]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 29 Aug 2011 13:49:18 +0200 X-Alinto-smtpauth-localdomain: Yes Received: from seldon (unknown [85.218.93.239]) (Authenticated sender: guillaume.yziquel@citycable.ch) by emailfrontal2.citycable.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EAEC120C14E; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:49:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from yziquel by seldon with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy0Jn-0005S0-Gj; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:47:55 +0200 Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:47:55 +0200 From: Guillaume Yziquel To: Chris Yocum Cc: Jacques Garrigue , Gerd Stolpmann , Jeff Meister , david.baelde@ens-lyon.org, caml-list Message-ID: <20110829114755.GD4564@localhost> References: <4E58CCC3.4040901@gmail.com> <1314457588.3496.86.camel@thinkpad> <1314473840.3496.132.camel@thinkpad> <1314486489.3496.179.camel@thinkpad> <61B410B8-15EF-4B18-9CC5-C224FB495353@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <4E5B75DE.2020609@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E5B75DE.2020609@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id p7TBnN42002826 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml and the Fragile Base Class Problem Le Monday 29 Aug 2011 à 12:19:58 (+0100), Chris Yocum a écrit : > > I was wondering if we should fold "Language Extensions" into the main > documentation? To my understanding, "Language Extensions" refers to part of the language that may evolve in future versions, as opposed to the core language which is supposed to be more stable. So this distinction does make sense. Now a few pointers in the main documentation to sections in "Language Extensions" aren't a bad idea either. -- Guillaume Yziquel