From: Lauri Alanko <la@iki.fi>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What is an applicative functor?
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 00:23:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110408212339.GD5064@melkinpaasi.cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0F248A34-05CF-4640-B122-75C4CE7C2CD2@mpi-sws.org>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:50:52AM +0200, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
> Aside: In general, you really want to have both: functors with
> impure bodies better be generative, while functors with pure bodies
> should be applicative. The absence of generative functors in OCaml
> also is the reason that you cannot unpack a first-class module in a
> functor body (non-locally), because that is unsound with applicative
> semantics.
I'm not sure if there really is an "absence": functions over
first-class modules _are_ generative functors for all practical
purposes. The only problem is that they only support type constraints
for first-order types (and even this can be circumvented with a bit of
magic).
Lauri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-08 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 21:12 Dawid Toton
2011-04-07 21:49 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-04-08 0:44 ` [Caml-list] " Dawid Toton
2011-04-08 1:34 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-04-08 6:50 ` [Caml-list] " Andreas Rossberg
2011-04-08 8:04 ` Alain Frisch
2011-04-08 8:20 ` Jacques Garrigue
2011-04-08 8:38 ` Jacques Garrigue
2011-04-08 8:44 ` Alain Frisch
2011-04-08 10:09 ` Jacques Garrigue
2011-04-08 11:25 ` Julien Signoles
2011-04-08 11:58 ` Alain Frisch
2011-04-11 7:10 ` Julien Signoles
2011-04-11 7:21 ` Julien Signoles
2011-04-08 13:43 ` rossberg
2011-04-08 16:26 ` Julien Signoles
2011-04-13 2:36 ` Lucas Dixon
2011-04-13 7:23 ` Andreas Rossberg
2011-04-15 3:08 ` Lucas Dixon
2011-04-19 14:04 ` Andreas Rossberg
2011-04-08 16:43 ` Till Varoquaux
2011-04-08 17:35 ` Alain Frisch
2011-04-08 18:44 ` Andreas Rossberg
2011-04-08 21:23 ` Lauri Alanko [this message]
2011-04-08 21:34 ` Guillaume Yziquel
2011-04-09 11:41 ` Andreas Rossberg
2011-04-08 5:35 ` Stefan Holdermans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110408212339.GD5064@melkinpaasi.cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=la@iki.fi \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox