From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:16:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101201111600.1fca76d5.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a8b01cb90da$da5e6240$8f1b26c0$@com>
Jon Harrop wrote:
> Because benchmarks like my HLVM ones have proven that LLVM can generate
> *much* faster code than ocamlopt does.
Until ocamlopt has an LLVM backend that is not a fair comparison.
I suspect that the speed differences between your HLVM and ocamlopt
have very little to do with LLVM and are almost totally due to
other factors.
> LLVM is also much better documented than ocamlopt's internals.
LLVM has well over 20 full time programmers working on it. The
Ocaml compiler has how many?
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-01 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-30 8:36 Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-30 10:48 ` [Caml-list] " Török Edwin
2010-11-30 10:55 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-30 17:01 ` bluestorm
2010-11-30 17:26 ` Török Edwin
2010-11-30 18:27 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2010-11-30 17:29 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-30 17:32 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-11-30 22:06 ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-30 22:48 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-01 14:11 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-01 15:00 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-01 22:03 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-02 1:17 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-12-03 10:03 ` ocamlopt LLVM support (Was: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT) Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-03 13:34 ` Till Varoquaux
2010-12-03 13:41 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-12-03 14:06 ` Török Edwin
2010-12-03 21:16 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-05 16:44 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-03 14:32 ` Philippe Strauss
2010-12-03 21:22 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-03 21:45 ` Philippe Strauss
2010-12-03 15:32 ` Michael Ekstrand
2010-12-03 21:34 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-03 20:07 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-05 16:37 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-05 16:57 ` Török Edwin
2010-12-05 20:54 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-05 20:12 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-05 21:21 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-05 21:44 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-06 22:38 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-05 22:41 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-12-05 22:34 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-12-06 8:27 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-06 9:28 ` David Rajchenbach-Teller
2010-12-06 11:08 ` Richard Jones
2010-12-06 20:18 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-01 0:16 ` Erik de Castro Lopo [this message]
2010-12-01 1:34 ` [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT Yoann Padioleau
2010-12-01 12:58 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-01 13:55 ` ivan chollet
2010-11-30 21:19 ` Jon Harrop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101201111600.1fca76d5.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com \
--to=mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox