* llvm? @ 2010-02-10 22:51 Raoul Duke 2010-02-11 1:33 ` [Caml-list] llvm? Jon Harrop 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Raoul Duke @ 2010-02-10 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: OCaml hi, any news about / anybody working on ocaml-on-llvm? just curious. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] llvm? 2010-02-10 22:51 llvm? Raoul Duke @ 2010-02-11 1:33 ` Jon Harrop 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Jon Harrop @ 2010-02-11 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: caml-list On Wednesday 10 February 2010 22:51:33 Raoul Duke wrote: > hi, > > any news about / anybody working on ocaml-on-llvm? I don't believe anyone is working on porting OCaml to LLVM. The nearest work is probably my own HLVM project which reached a major milestone recently and is now capable of high-performance parallel programming: http://flyingfrogblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/naive-parallelism-with-hlvm.html From the point of view of an OCaml programmer, HLVM is a DSL that drops various features from OCaml (e.g. polymorphic recursion) in order to provide easily-obtained, predictable and high performance. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-11 0:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-02-10 22:51 llvm? Raoul Duke 2010-02-11 1:33 ` [Caml-list] llvm? Jon Harrop
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox