From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B63FBC37 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:37:16 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsDADrJSUtQRFuwX2dsb2JhbACbVBcLCgQWtRyCNoF5BA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,251,1262559600"; d="scan'208";a="41378933" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2010 21:37:16 +0100 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NU4XC-0005g1-CF; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:37:14 +0000 Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:37:14 +0000 To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, shawjef3@msu.edu Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: HLVM ray tracer performance Message-ID: <20100110203714.GA21734@annexia.org> References: <20100110132942.1995706rwh00q1zq@mail.msu.edu> <201001102014.29726.jon@ffconsultancy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201001102014.29726.jon@ffconsultancy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Richard Jones X-Spam: no; 0.00; userland:01 10,:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 kernel:02 linux:07 red:92 mean:08 i'm:09 tracer:13 case:13 jan:15 running:15 ppc:16 2010:83 On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 08:14:29PM +0000, Jon Harrop wrote: > on a 64-bit Linux kernel running 32-bit userland I'm assuming you mean x86 (not eg ppc64), in which case that's a very unusual choice. Any reason for this? Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat