From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318E6BBAF for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:21:19 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArsBAGOftUrUnwdkkWdsb2JhbACCIZhpAQEBAQkLCgcTBLIGhBsF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,418,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="46910583" Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net ([212.159.7.100]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 20 Sep 2009 12:21:10 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArEFAHOetUrUnw4S/2dsb2JhbACCIcsshBsF Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net ([212.159.14.18]) by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2009 11:21:09 +0100 Received: from [87.114.86.170] (helo=leper.local) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1MpJXZ-0001RO-6C for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:21:09 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Scilab: Why not written in OCaml? Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:32:29 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <20090919005953.20724aglhumqekfd@webmail.in-berlin.de> <20090920090848.GB11999@yeeloong> In-Reply-To: <20090920090848.GB11999@yeeloong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909201232.29888.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Plusnet-Relay: ed56628ebbf9b44b4f9ee5aec9053961 X-Spam: no; 0.00; scilab:01 ocaml:01 inria's:01 ocaml:01 2009:98 frog:98 sml:01 sml:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 guess:04 inria:06 princeton:06 probably:07 written:07 On Sunday 20 September 2009 10:08:48 rixed@happyleptic.org wrote: > > ...why is that program not written with INRIA's Ocaml? > > Probably for the same reason than all Princeton university > programs are not written in SML/NJ (so I guess) ? INRIA aren't using OCaml because SML/NJ sucks? ;-) -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e