* OCaml on Mips for IRIX n32 : why not 64bits ?
@ 2009-08-14 15:48 rixed
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: rixed @ 2009-08-14 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
The question might look stupid, but I'm wondering why uintnat was
not chosen to be "long long" on this architecture.
Maybe the ARCH_SIXTYFOUR version of Ocaml was not ready at that time ?
Or is there a downside at using the full 64bits registers on this arch
that I'm unable to see ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-08-14 15:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-14 15:48 OCaml on Mips for IRIX n32 : why not 64bits ? rixed
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox