GtkMozilla and LablGTK

GtkMozilla and LablGTK

[Grünewald Michaël]

Dear list,

I am interested in embedding Mozilla in a Gtk+ application. There  
exists a GtkMozilla widget published on mozilla.org making Mozilla  
available on the C-side, and I found a potential binding for this  
widget in LablGTK in lablgtk2's mailing list's archive: the discussion  
I refer to occured in 2003. What is the status of these bindings today?
-- 
Cheers,
Michaël

Re: [Caml-list] GtkMozilla and LablGTK

[Richard Jones]

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 02:12:49PM +0200, Grünewald Michaël wrote:
> Dear list,
> 
> I am interested in embedding Mozilla in a Gtk+ application. There  
> exists a GtkMozilla widget published on mozilla.org making Mozilla  
> available on the C-side, and I found a potential binding for this  
> widget in LablGTK in lablgtk2's mailing list's archive: the discussion  
> I refer to occured in 2003. What is the status of these bindings today?

I used this, a _long_ time ago (2002? 2003?), to embed Mozilla into a
commercial application I wrote at the time.  It worked and was stable.

However I have no idea about the code now, whether it will still work
with newer versions of Mozilla, or what happened upstream.

I strongly suggest that you try to get it included in lablgtk2.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones
Red Hat

Re: [Caml-list] GtkMozilla and LablGTK

[Grünewald Michaël]

Le 3 juin 09 à 19:57, Richard Jones a écrit :

>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 02:12:49PM +0200, Grünewald Michaël wrote:
>> I am interested in embedding Mozilla in a Gtk+ application. There
>> exists a GtkMozilla widget published on mozilla.org making Mozilla
>> available on the C-side, and I found a potential binding for this
>> widget in LablGTK in lablgtk2's mailing list's archive: the  
>> discussion
>> I refer to occured in 2003. What is the status of these bindings  
>> today?
>
> I used this, a _long_ time ago (2002? 2003?), to embed Mozilla into a
> commercial application I wrote at the time.  It worked and was stable.

It might be 2003 since you took part to the discussion I formerly  
referred to.

> However I have no idea about the code now, whether it will still work
> with newer versions of Mozilla, or what happened upstream.
>
> I strongly suggest that you try to get it included in lablgtk2.

This is how I pictured tings myself. Taking a big breath before  
starting the work, I suddenly realized I had air enough to ask if  
somebody preceded me.

Thank you for your answer.
-- 
Tia,
Michaël