From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mshinwell@janestcapital.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D37BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:34:40 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmcCAKvh70kmachml2dsb2JhbACWSAEBAQEBCBUHuTaDdQY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,235,1238968800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="25039559"
Received: from mx2.janestcapital.com ([38.105.200.102])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Apr 2009 12:34:33 +0200
Received: from nyc-qsv-mail1.delacy.com ([172.25.22.57])
	by mx2.janestcapital.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mshinwell@janestcapital.com>)
	id 1LwwGF-0001Gg-Tx; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:34:31 -0400
Received: from nyc-qsv-004.delacy.com ([172.25.22.194] helo=qsmtp.delacy.com)
	by nyc-qsv-mail1.DELACY.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mshinwell@janestcapital.com>)
	id 1LwwGF-0006lB-SW; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:34:31 -0400
Received: from lon-qws-008.delacy.com ([172.30.3.108] helo=lon-qws-008)
	by qsmtp.delacy.com with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <mshinwell@janestcapital.com>)
	id 1LwwGE-0006Cb-Oc; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:34:31 -0400
Received: by lon-qws-008 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:34:30 +0100
From: "Mark Shinwell" <mshinwell@janestcapital.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:34:30 +0100
To: Alexey Rodriguez <mrchebas@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlopt debugging options
Message-ID: <20090423103430.GH29676@janestcapital.com>
References: <4b39c80a0904230330r759d3429jae4146d2c2db7a36@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4b39c80a0904230330r759d3429jae4146d2c2db7a36@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Spam: no; 0.00; shinwell:01 ocamlopt:01 0200,:01 ocamlopt:01 ocaml:01 23,:98 2009:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 functions:01 constructs:02 debugging:03 programming:03 compiled:04 thu:05 

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:30:31PM +0200, Alexey Rodriguez wrote:
> Sometimes it is useful to see what is the code produced by ocamlopt in
> order to assess the performance of programming constructs. It is
> possible to use -dcmm, but it is difficult to relate ocaml functions
> to their compiled form due to the names used in the cmm dump. How do
> you people get around that difficulty?

I use objdump -Dr :)

Mark