From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6338EBBC4 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:31:12 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUBADRb1EnUnwcjimdsb2JhbACCIZN6AQEBCgkMBw8GuTOCOYFDBg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,431,1233529200"; d="scan'208";a="26885236" Received: from relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net ([212.159.7.35]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 02 Apr 2009 15:31:12 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmEFADRb1EnUnw4U/2dsb2JhbACCIc1rgjmBQwY Received: from pih-relay08.plus.net ([212.159.14.20]) by relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 02 Apr 2009 14:31:11 +0100 Received: from [87.115.30.229] (helo=leper.local) by pih-relay08.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1LpN0h-0006fl-BI for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:31:11 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: LLC book [was: Questions] Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:37:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <449979.43681.qm@web54104.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <449979.43681.qm@web54104.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904021437.28166.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Plusnet-Relay: 8cc166bb6613a9fc16075b9b35082adb X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 lablgtk:01 camlp:01 ffi:01 stub:01 compilation:01 bindings:01 2009:98 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 newbie:02 ides:02 opengl:03 On Thursday 02 April 2009 13:41:01 Ed Keith wrote: > Having said that, I currently have some free time time and would be willing > to offer my assistance to this project. It would give me the opportunity to > hone my writing and ocaml skills, and I believe as an experienced > professional programmer (I have worked in government, military, finance, > medicine, aviation, and research) and ocaml newbie I could bring a useful > perspective to the project. > > I hope I can be of service, I think the existing books cover the core parts of the language well so there is no need for further work in that area but I would like to see books covering the following topics: . Batteries (!). . Libraries, e.g. LablGTK. . Post 3.10 camlp4. . Other tools, e.g. menhir, dpygen, bitstrings, micmatch. There are also some areas where I think today's OCaml software could be improved: . Automatic FFI stub JIT compilation using LLVM. . OpenGL 3 bindings. . GUI libraries. . IDEs (probably depends upon GUI libraries). -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e