From: Kuba Ober <ober.14@osu.edu>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] WideStudio
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:12:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811100912.14939.ober.14@osu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811071623.22910.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
On Friday 07 November 2008, Jon Harrop wrote:
> I was just perusing SourceForge and stumbled upon a popular software
> package classed as being written partly in OCaml called WideStudio:
>
> http://www.widestudio.org
>
> This is apparently a cross platform IDE with a GUI toolkit that supports
> several languages including OCaml.
>
> Has anyone heard of or used this?
They use a me-too application framework, which is an achievement in itself --
a lot of work went into it, and it is cross-platform.
They do have a "solid" history of source tarball releases, but their CVS
repository has been created in 2006 and left untouched since. Perhaps they
use internal source control, but that's quite unkosher for such a project.
I've downloaded the sources to see how they are. It seems that "mechanical"
porting to Qt would delete 30%+ code (tens of thousands of lines), and
further refactoring would perhaps slash it all by 50% total. If I were
optimistic, given a good design groundwork, a reduction by 2/3rds of the code
size would not be unthinkable.
The codebase compiles using a C++ compiler and would be typical of a WINAPI or
X11-era mindset. It reads like MFC source code, style-wise. I'd imagine it
to be a major pain to work with if you're "spoiled" with C++, as opposed to
"C/C++", which is neither C nor real C++.
Some of their features may be worth replicating, but I wouldn't go near that
codebase with a long stick, simply because it has bitrotted in spite of being
actively maintained. Their design has bitrotted, that is.
I can't of course convince anyone of choosing vaporware (in-progress Camelia)
over a project that's obviously maintained and has some userbase ;) The above
are just my opinions.
Cheers, Kuba
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-10 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-07 16:23 WideStudio Jon Harrop
2008-11-10 14:12 ` Kuba Ober [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811100912.14939.ober.14@osu.edu \
--to=ober.14@osu.edu \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox