Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Damien Guichard" <alphablock@orange.fr>
To: "caml-list@yquem.inria.fr" <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:26:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080814132501.637C11C0004B@mwinf2128.orange.fr> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 555 bytes --]


Well said Brian.

Any tutorial is good enough at underlining respective language features.
Haskell has lazy evaluation, Caml has strict evaluation, don't pretend it's a secret and don't ask whether good or bad. 
Be responsible, try it yourself if needed, then choose yourself.

- damien






> circ ular wrote:
>
> > What are the advantages/disadvantages when comparing OCaml to Haskell?
> 
>
> The biggest disadvantage of comparing Ocaml to Haskell would have to be 
> causing a long, pointless flamewar. Offhand, I can't think of an upside.
>
> Brian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1350 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2008-08-14 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-14 13:26 Damien Guichard [this message]
     [not found] <fa.e3jKyg6bl9+vTkPgypQ4ZRzEoos@ifi.uio.no>
2013-03-18  9:08 ` adrian.alexander.may
2013-03-18  9:48   ` Malcolm Matalka
2013-03-18  9:59     ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-03-18 11:05       ` Adrian May
2013-03-18 11:26     ` Kakadu
2013-03-19  1:23       ` Francois Berenger
2013-03-26 10:36         ` Nicolas Braud-Santoni
2013-03-26  0:49   ` Kristopher Micinski
2013-03-26  2:37     ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2013-03-26  2:57       ` Kristopher Micinski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-13 12:48 circ ular
2008-08-13 13:27 ` [Caml-list] " Brian Hurt
2008-08-14  0:09 ` Jon Harrop
2008-08-14  2:46   ` David Thomas
2008-08-14  2:52     ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2008-08-14 10:37       ` Paolo Donadeo
2008-08-14 12:17     ` Jon Harrop
2008-08-14 16:44       ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2008-08-14 11:50 ` blue storm
2008-08-14 12:47   ` David Mitchell
2008-08-14 13:28   ` Peng Zang
2008-08-14 14:01     ` Peng Zang
2008-08-15  2:09       ` blue storm
2008-08-14 13:57   ` Jon Harrop
2008-08-14 14:06     ` Peng Zang
2008-08-14 14:21     ` Vincent Hanquez
2008-08-14 14:44       ` Jon Harrop
2008-08-14 20:57     ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-08-14 21:16       ` Jon Harrop
2008-08-14 21:50         ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-08-15  0:15           ` Jon Harrop
2008-08-15  1:14             ` Stéphane Glondu
2008-08-17  1:00             ` Luca Saiu
2008-08-19  2:40             ` Paul Snively
2008-08-20 11:33 ` Dr. Thomas Fischbacher
2008-08-21  8:47   ` DooMeeR
2008-08-21 10:59     ` David Teller
2008-08-21 13:52     ` Dr. Thomas Fischbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080814132501.637C11C0004B@mwinf2128.orange.fr \
    --to=alphablock@orange.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox