From: Vincent Hanquez <tab@snarc.org>
To: Brighten Godfrey <pbg@cs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: David Allsopp <dra-news@metastack.com>,
OCaml List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Value shadowing (tangent)
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:05:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080813110546.GA22672@snarc.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1C96BA4C-8E65-44AA-96CD-C1CA399635E2@cs.berkeley.edu>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:49:23AM -0700, Brighten Godfrey wrote:
> Going off on a tangent here...
>
> On Aug 13, 2008, at 2:56 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
>>
>> let lst = [5; 4; 3; 2; 1; 0; -1; -2; -3; -4; -5]
>> in
>> let filter = List.filter (fun x -> x > 0)
>> in
>> let double = List.map (fun x -> -2 * x)
>> in
>> let sort = List.sort compare
>> in
>> (sort $$ double $$ filter) lst
>
> I've seen little of other people's OCaml code, so out of curiosity, do
> you or others actually write code formatted like the above, as opposed to
> the more compact and (I think) readable
>
> let lst = [5; 4; 3; 2; 1; 0; -1; -2; -3; -4; -5] in
> let filter = List.filter (fun x -> x > 0) in
> let double = List.map (fun x -> -2 * x) in
> let sort = List.sort compare in
> (sort $$ double $$ filter) lst
I write the compact way too, which i found much more readable.
I really dislike the wavy effect, of the former example, it has on code.
however i understand why some people do it the first way. after the "in"
you're in some sort of new scope (previous scope augmented by your
let binds)
--
Vincent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-13 8:54 Value shadowing David Allsopp
2008-08-13 9:15 ` [Caml-list] " Brighten Godfrey
2008-08-13 9:56 ` David Allsopp
2008-08-13 10:49 ` [Caml-list] Value shadowing (tangent) Brighten Godfrey
2008-08-13 11:04 ` David Allsopp
2008-08-13 11:04 ` Brighten Godfrey
2008-08-13 11:17 ` Daniel Bünzli
2008-08-13 23:05 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-08-13 23:33 ` Daniel Bünzli
2008-08-13 11:05 ` Vincent Hanquez [this message]
2008-08-16 20:02 ` Pierre Etchemaïté
2008-08-17 8:07 ` David Allsopp
2008-08-17 10:28 ` Pierre Etchemaïté
2008-08-13 10:33 ` [Caml-list] Value shadowing Jim Farrand
2008-08-13 10:12 ` Richard Jones
2008-08-13 11:04 ` David Allsopp
2008-08-13 12:26 ` blue storm
2008-08-13 15:03 ` Mauricio Fernandez
2008-08-13 11:50 ` blue storm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080813110546.GA22672@snarc.org \
--to=tab@snarc.org \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=dra-news@metastack.com \
--cc=pbg@cs.berkeley.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox