From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43815BBAF for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:13:53 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvMCALuRmkhDWxLCbmdsb2JhbACBWI9pNppr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,320,1215381600"; d="scan'208";a="15792958" Received: from ip67-91-18-194.z18-91-67.customer.algx.net (HELO server1.bertec.net) ([67.91.18.194]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2008 15:13:52 +0200 Received: from kuba.bertec.net (kuba.bertec.net [192.168.2.16]) by server1.bertec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3441056DD for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:13:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Kuba Ober To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] native vs bytecode Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:13:51 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <74a4f4670808061258q30513bbdl446240feab3fdc36@mail.gmail.com> <20080806212103.GA13743@annexia.org> <200808070902.38318.ober.14@osu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200808070902.38318.ober.14@osu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808070913.51534.ober.14@osu.edu> X-Spam: no; 0.00; bytecode:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 cheers:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 native:03 python:03 redhat:03 redhat:03 osu:07 red:92 written:07 rather:08 memory:09 On Thursday 07 August 2008, Kuba Ober wrote: > > With this strategy, OCaml programs at Red Hat are performing as well > > as C code, and about an order of magnitude faster & an order of > > magnitude lower memory usage than programs written in Python, which is > > the main language used around here. > > What does RedHat use OCaml for? That's just to satisfy my curiosity. A > quick google for ocaml at redhat did not yield much. I should say that I did look at your page, so the question should rather be: what does RedHat use Ocaml for, other than what RJ is using it for? :) Cheers, Kuba