From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: peng.zang@gmail.com, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] thousands of CPU cores
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:00:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807101500.03079.jon@ffconsultancy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807100944.29221.peng.zang@gmail.com>
On Thursday 10 July 2008 14:44:25 Peng Zang wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2008 01:57:44 am J C wrote:
> > I know that Caml team wanted to see if many-core shared-memory systems
> > were going to stick around before bothering with Caml development that
> > takes advantage of them.
> >
> > Well, it looks like they are here to stay, after all:
> >
> > http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-9981760-64.html
>
> This article doesn't say anything about whether the many-core system will
> be shared-memory. Remember, a shared memory architecture has to deal with
> cache and memory coherence. The prevailing view is that the overhead for
> such an approach does not scale. For massively parallel computation we
> must turn to message passing or barrier/sync paradigms.
>
> I am doubtful that a thousand core machine will be shared-memory based.
Today's biggest shared-memory supercomputers already have thousands of cores.
> Also, this is a CNET article.. not exactly known for being in depth or well
> researched and this article is no exception. It is an article based
> entirely on a few speculative comments of some Intel guys. I wouldn't take
> it too seriously.
>
> Personally, I can see why the Caml development team opted not to put effort
> into dealing with shared-memory systems.
The OCaml development team put huge effort into their concurrent run-time.
> It is a stop-gap solution...
That is not true. Many-core machines will always be decomposed into
shared-memory clusters of as many cores as possible because shared memory
parallelism will always be orders of magnitude more efficient than
distributed parallelism.
OCaml is already ~8x slower than F# on today's eight core desktops. If OCaml's
shortcomings are not remedied then it will become exponentially slower than
parallelized languages like F# over the next few years until we reach the
limit of shared memory parallelism in ~10 years time.
Consequently, the parallel GC scheduled for this summer will be the single
most important development in OCaml world ever.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-10 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-10 5:57 J C
2008-07-10 6:15 ` [Caml-list] " Erik de Castro Lopo
2008-07-10 12:47 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-10 13:48 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
2008-07-10 11:35 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-14 11:32 ` J C
2008-07-14 12:08 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-14 17:04 ` Mike Lin
2008-07-14 17:28 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-14 17:16 ` Richard Jones
2008-07-10 13:21 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-10 13:44 ` Peng Zang
2008-07-10 14:00 ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2008-07-10 22:25 ` Richard Jones
2008-07-10 23:04 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-10 23:41 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11 0:17 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11 9:30 ` Richard Jones
2008-09-21 19:05 ` Michaël Grünewald
2008-09-21 21:41 ` Jon Harrop
2008-09-22 7:51 ` Alan Schmitt
2008-09-22 19:03 ` Jon Harrop
2008-09-22 19:49 ` David Teller
2008-09-23 6:42 ` kirillkh
2008-09-24 13:30 ` [Caml-list] Link tracking Chris Clearwater
2008-09-24 15:43 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-11 14:53 ` [Caml-list] thousands of CPU cores Peng Zang
2008-07-15 14:39 ` Kuba Ober
2008-07-19 12:41 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-10 19:15 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-10 20:07 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-07-10 20:24 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-10 21:02 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-07-10 21:19 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-10 21:35 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-10 22:39 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-15 15:57 ` Kuba Ober
2008-07-15 18:03 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-15 19:23 ` Adrien
2008-07-15 19:45 ` Adrien
2008-07-16 8:59 ` Michaël Grünewald
2008-07-16 16:43 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-16 11:46 ` Richard Jones
2008-07-16 18:35 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2008-07-17 12:48 ` Kuba Ober
2008-07-15 15:21 ` Kuba Ober
2008-07-10 20:48 ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2008-07-10 21:12 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-10 23:33 ` [Caml-list] " Oliver Bandel
2008-07-10 23:43 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11 6:26 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-07-11 8:50 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2008-07-11 9:29 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-07-15 16:01 ` [Caml-list] " Kuba Ober
2008-07-13 3:17 ` Code Mobility [was Re: thousands of CPU cores] Robert Fischer
2008-07-11 3:01 ` [Caml-list] thousands of CPU cores Brian Hurt
2008-07-11 13:01 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-11 13:43 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-11 14:03 ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2008-07-11 15:08 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-11 17:28 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-11 17:54 ` Richard Jones
2008-07-11 18:30 ` Raoul Duke
2008-07-12 17:35 ` Brian Hurt
2008-07-11 15:01 ` Peng Zang
2008-07-12 0:23 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-12 22:54 ` J C
2008-07-19 12:06 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11 14:06 ` Xavier Leroy
2008-07-11 15:20 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11 15:23 ` Bill
2008-07-11 18:14 ` Mattias Engdegård
2008-07-12 23:05 ` J C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807101500.03079.jon@ffconsultancy.com \
--to=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=peng.zang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox