From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fmonnier@linux-nantes.fr.eu.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB8FBBCA
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 11 May 2008 17:02:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwBAL+nJkjVJFBbmWdsb2JhbACSCQEBAQEBCAUGCREDlns
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,469,1204498800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="12468796"
Received: from mx-out.libertysurf.net (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) ([213.36.80.91])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 May 2008 17:02:41 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (91.168.186.177) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.3.118.8)
        id 47F1FEBB00D2FD8B for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Sun, 11 May 2008 17:56:26 +0200
From: Florent Monnier <fmonnier@linux-nantes.fr.eu.org>
Organization: l'Association Linux-Nantes
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Hashtbl.remove legal within Hashtbl.iter for the same hash table?
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 17:10:06 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <87tzh5kxhl.fsf@linux-france.org> <200805111642.14164.fmonnier@linux-nantes.fr.eu.org> <9d3ec8300805110746s3b4ad089p9d6572a491403384@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9d3ec8300805110746s3b4ad089p9d6572a491403384@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200805111710.06994.fmonnier@linux-nantes.fr.eu.org>
X-Face: "RXbh'>3l!,Z~K9[.=}f[D{bea)>G??RYB%BP}f%u/=~]AJ0^_2c9&9Ds2h6=.x`i,#xlTI
 9S\iD:y}Bz1xIee)R36u?Bh_Y.Ph}9bNyKlO\5Ic`1x~T<A*FhtSx
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; hashtbl:01 hashtbl:01 iter:01 hash:01 arrays:01 associative:01 iterating:01 bindings:01 unspecified:01 caml-list:01 element:03 dependent:04 encounter:05 manual:06 table:93 

> Hatables are arrays of associative lists. When you are iterating over
> them removing any element you have already visited should be ok.
> Removing elements you haven't visited yet could cause you to encounter
> them anyhow.

which means that it is dependent to the order in which the content is itered,
while the manual says :
"The order in which the bindings are passed to f is unspecified."