From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24166BBCA for ; Sun, 11 May 2008 17:00:15 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwBAFamJkjVJFBbmWdsb2JhbACSCQEBAQEBCAUGCREDlns X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,469,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="12468720" Received: from mx-out.libertysurf.net (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) ([213.36.80.91]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 May 2008 17:00:14 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (91.168.186.177) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.3.118.8) id 47F1FE3700D496FC for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Sun, 11 May 2008 17:59:16 +0200 From: Florent Monnier Organization: l'Association Linux-Nantes To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Hashtbl.remove legal within Hashtbl.iter for the same hash table? Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 17:07:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <87tzh5kxhl.fsf@linux-france.org> <200805111642.14164.fmonnier@linux-nantes.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <200805111642.14164.fmonnier@linux-nantes.fr.eu.org> X-Face: -0"dKXwF0PiXr]fa$^)NJY7$;waqUckGcM7&q,VU?Xv\[=CiVM]g]pDs^xmfU9+Q=Z,OdfMHUR-7Ao%evJh.=aiq,#r0Ux0dm'!l|zeAXj||$>1_(Lv4Hc",&F}sbHeK0`SBA$_|XP MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805111707.30213.fmonnier@linux-nantes.fr.eu.org> X-Spam: no; 0.00; hashtbl:01 hashtbl:01 iter:01 hash:01 sdt:01 iter:01 toplevel:01 caml-list:01 table:93 wrong:10 i've:12 appear:17 too:17 same:17 would:18 > (* this one would not appear with the sdt Hashtbl.iter ! *) wrong, it appears too I've made a mistake in the toplevel :)