From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D843CBBCA for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 09:56:06 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvoBADzxJEhQRFuwiGdsb2JhbACSCQEBAQ8gmGA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,464,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="12061693" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 May 2008 09:56:06 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jujw3-0000bi-UW; Sat, 10 May 2008 08:56:03 +0100 Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 08:56:03 +0100 To: Ionut Georgescu Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml 3.10.2 on Tru64 Message-ID: <20080510075603.GB2043@annexia.org> References: <20080509075602.GB25640@annexia.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Richard Jones X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 0200,:01 cvs:01 bug:01 10,:98 wrote:01 stack:01 heap:01 caml-list:01 failing:02 failing:02 red:92 seem:08 memory:09 equivalent:09 On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 09:52:41AM +0200, Ionut Georgescu wrote: > Hi Richard, > > thank you for your answer. Both 3.10.2 and 3.11 CVS fail with the same > "out of memory" message. [...] It doesn't seem to be the bug I was thinking of. I've no idea whether Tru64 supports some equivalent of 'strace', but you could try stracing the failing process to see why it's really failing. (eg. stack? heap?) Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat