Re: [Caml-list] break and continue for OCaml

[Micha <micha-1@fantasymail.de>]

On Thursday 10 April 2008 22:35:36 Eric Cooper wrote:
> It adds more imperative baggage to the language,

good thing. OCaml advertises the imperative paradigm it supports, so it should 
support it right.

> going against its 
> "mostly functional" style.  And it doesn't add any expressive power,
> since you can easily use exceptions, or bool refs as in Pascal, to
> achieve the same effect.

I'm interessted in the cleanest way to solve a problem, whether it's 
functional or imperative or oo in the end doesn't matter. And replacing a 
simple thing with myriads of exception code and workarounds is not my 
unterstanding of "easily useable".
But that discussion is academic, nothing will evolve here,

 Michael