From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C4FBBC1 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:39:42 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmcAAJ7D/UfVpUAUjmdsb2JhbACRTQEBAQEJAwsHFJlg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,636,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="10704831" Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 10 Apr 2008 16:39:42 +0200 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2008 14:39:41 -0000 Received: from p57B1E39E.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO pc21b.local) [87.177.227.158] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 10 Apr 2008 16:39:41 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20477425 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+VYNdcMIyVlIQUC2znUog+/AnJjRdPO/FCv6N4yF 1KonnOGGZIaJB8 From: Michael Wohlwend To: Martin Jambon Subject: Re: [Caml-list] break and continue for OCaml Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:38:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <5b0248170804091859s75c3f725s2db53f48fba6735c@mail.gmail.com> <200804101624.08376.micha-1@fantasymail.de> In-Reply-To: Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804101638.38702.micha-1@fantasymail.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 donnerstag:01 10.:98 caml-list:01 loops:02 functional:02 sie:96 michael:07 michael:07 break:08 break:08 think:13 should:13 isn't:13 done:14 Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 16:35:30 schrieben Sie: > > I think break and continue should be restricted to inside of loops, which > > isn't hard to do. > > I would not say this until I have done it myself :-) > yes sure, I did it :-) allthough not for a functional language Michael