From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481CDBC6C for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:19:45 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAFBzokfUnw6Flmdsb2JhbACCNo1uAQEBAQcEBgcKEQedCw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,289,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7505075" Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net ([212.159.14.133]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2008 10:19:44 +0100 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1JKs3k-0004TQ-3P for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:19:44 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Caml Community Code Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:14:40 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801312138.32524.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20080201081340.GB16010@takhisis.invalid> In-Reply-To: <20080201081340.GB16010@takhisis.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802010914.41643.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Plusnet-Relay: aee7c4234208a0765fb3634aae8b9f55 X-Spam: no; 0.00; zacchiroli:01 distros:01 ocaml:01 zack:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 motivation:02 debian:04 thu:05 fork:05 stefano:05 On Friday 01 February 2008 08:13:40 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:38:32PM +0000, Jon Harrop wrote: > > Will your or Jonathan Bryant's distros include an enhanced OCaml or are > > they collections of third party libraries only? > > Jon, pretty please, stop it. You already know that we (Debian), me > (Zack), and whatever else entities which are associated to my free will > are *NOT* going to fork OCaml or any of its parts. (The reason being > that I don't think it would be beneficial to the community in any way at > this point, but this motivation is OT here.) Sure. Will either of the other community OCamls be forking OCaml? -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e