From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, SUBJECT_EXCESS_QP autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A40ABC6C for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:32:35 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj0KAGN7oEdDWxLC/2dsb2JhbACBWI8oeJ5o X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,280,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7447024" Received: from ip67-91-18-194.z18-91-67.customer.algx.net (HELO server1.bertec.net) ([67.91.18.194]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2008 22:32:34 +0100 Received: from kuba.bertec.net (kuba.bertec.net [192.168.2.16]) by server1.bertec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FEACDFAF for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:32:33 -0500 (EST) From: Kuba Ober To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: The OCaml Community (aka back =?iso-8859-1?q?fromthe=09Developer?= Days) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:32:32 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20071204.744707) References: <1201439362.6302.15.camel@Blefuscu> <200801300917.13359.ober.14@osu.edu> <020601c86367$64fb47f0$839017ac@countertenor> In-Reply-To: <020601c86367$64fb47f0$839017ac@countertenor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801301632.32893.ober.14@osu.edu> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 model:01 cheers:01 bram:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 suggesting:02 fewer:02 sell:96 sell:96 unit:03 aka:04 scheme:05 economy:94 On Wednesday 30 January 2008, David Allsopp wrote: > > It would make sense as a business venture when you'd throw in some > > economy of scale. MS can sell visual studio for peanuts, and keep that > > business unit out of the red, of course because they sell so many. > > > > For relatively small projects like OCaml, any "pay for a feature" scheme > > would necessarily be out of reach of many customers. > > Vim does this very well with "sponsor a feature"[1] - all you need is a > structured wish-list that people can mark a (financial) interest in. That > way, if you want a feature, and so do other people, then there may be > enough combined sponsorship to pay a (reasonable) amount for it. Bram only > requires enough to pay for a basic salary so he can take time off work. > > While I have no idea how many people use Vim, I would imagine that it's > rather fewer than MS Visual Studio suggesting that the finance model > "works". Yeah, if you have a "feature accounts" where people can pool the money, then of course it'd work. My assumption was that one person pays for a single feature. Cheers, Kuba