From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3B8BC6C for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:57:22 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAOqJnUdYvxGE/2dsb2JhbACrQA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,260,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="6662714" Received: from www.rastageeks.org (HELO mail.rastageeks.org) ([88.191.17.132]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2008 16:57:25 +0100 Received: from [192.168.112.144] (sphinx.lix.polytechnique.fr [129.104.11.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rastageeks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F04F9B5F4 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:56:51 +0100 (CET) From: Romain Beauxis To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: The OCaml Community (aka back from the Developer Days) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:56:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <1201439362.6302.15.camel@Blefuscu> <200801281639.57684.toots@rastageeks.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801281656.28921.toots@rastageeks.org> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 1901:98 defines:01 caml-list:01 hacker:02 aka:04 split:08 machine:09 shutdown:10 rule:10 loi:88 think:13 happens:13 kind:13 kind:13 Le Monday 28 January 2008 16:49:28 Sylvain Le Gall, vous avez =C3=A9crit=C2= =A0: > I think we should great an "association loi 1901". I was thinking of > doing so... Good ! > But you should know that most of the time > > > > > company/hacker/.... =C2=A0decide to split and > > continue alone, or simply to shutdown one machine, or claim copyright, > > etc... > > > > happens also with an organization. This kind of organization needs > manpower which are really provided by one or two people. This kind of > things dies as soon as only one of them decide to leave... > > In other words, having an organization that defines who is in charge > won't provide stability or prevent people from doing stupid thing ;-) Sure, but a seperate organisation has the legitimity to rule out issues whe= n=20 they happen... Romain