From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0773EBC6C for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:40:46 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAGqGnUdYvxGE/2dsb2JhbACrOg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,260,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="6661681" Received: from www.rastageeks.org (HELO mail.rastageeks.org) ([88.191.17.132]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2008 16:40:45 +0100 Received: from [192.168.112.144] (sphinx.lix.polytechnique.fr [129.104.11.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rastageeks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47439D2FA for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:39:59 +0100 (CET) From: Romain Beauxis To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: The OCaml Community (aka back from the Developer Days) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:39:57 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <1201439362.6302.15.camel@Blefuscu> <200801281452.26192.toots@rastageeks.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801281639.57684.toots@rastageeks.org> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 cpan:01 ovh:98 scm:98 nonprofit:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 define:02 define:02 modules:02 hacker:02 supported:02 kernel:02 kernel:02 strong:96 Le Monday 28 January 2008 15:42:15 Sylvain Le Gall, vous avez =C3=A9crit=C2= =A0: > On 28-01-2008, Romain Beauxis wrote: > > Le Sunday 27 January 2008 14:09:22 David Teller, vous avez =C3=A9crit= =C2=A0: > > > > Another question is who will provide machines and means to acheive it. > > In particular, a repository =C3=A0 la CPAN for modules would be a great= thing, > > but it would have to be supported by some structure... > > Indeed, you miss one point: my company will provide resource, if needed > for it. > > For now, the computer is hired (OVH SuperPlan 08) but i don't have > enough time to set it up. > > I only plan to provide a GForge/planets/SCM repository for now. But in > the future, if anything else is required, i will be able to provide more > things to it. Wouldn't it be better to define a real structure where your company and oth= ers=20 may take part ? =46or instance, kernel.org is run by a non-profit organisation, see:=20 http://www.kernel.org/nonprofit.html The fact is that, if we don't setup strong and clear definitions of who's i= n=20 charge of what or don't define a common head for the community, what will=20 happen if any of the involved company/hacker/.... decide to split and=20 continue alone, or simply to shutdown one machine, or claim copyright, etc.= =2E. Again, I don't suspect any bad intention, but this is the only way to preve= nt=20 them, isn't it ? Romain