From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED79BC6B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:37:17 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4HAB/amEfUnw7Vlmdsb2JhbACCNY1vAQEBAQcEBgcKEQeeRw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,247,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="21776317" Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net ([212.159.14.213]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2008 03:37:17 +0100 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1JIERQ-0005hG-QJ for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:37:16 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] strange timing between search trees Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:31:20 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47993C41.1050900@univ-savoie.fr> In-Reply-To: <47993C41.1050900@univ-savoie.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801250231.20864.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Plusnet-Relay: 2b1255cb197800a586dc8f5595b32607 X-Spam: no; 0.00; christophe:01 raffalli:01 gava:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 module:03 frederic:03 parallel:05 strange:08 might:12 ltd:87 products:86 between:13 On Friday 25 January 2008 01:32:49 Christophe Raffalli wrote: > I wanted to compare 2-3-4 trees... PS: You might also want to check out the parallel implementation of the Set module by Dr Frederic Gava. He used the "n"th-nearest neighbour program from OCaml for Scientists as a test case and the results were very impressive! -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e