From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
To: benjamin.canou@gmail.com
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Strange performances
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:15:03 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080118.111503.185813743.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1200619933.6383.47.camel@benjamin-laptop>
The problem seems to be in list_of_string.
If I write:
let list_of_string s =
let rec list_of_string s i =
if i < String.length s then s.[i] :: list_of_string s (succ i) else []
in list_of_string s 0
I get a 10 time increase in speed for bytecode, and 5 times better for
native code, as one would expect. Out-of-bounds exceptions are
intended as fatal errors, do not try to catch them...
By the way, on my machine your version doesn't even work in native
code, I only get segfaults. This is allowed behaviour for
out-of-bounds access.
Jacques Garrigue
From: Benjamin Canou <benjamin.canou@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> The code following my message is way faster in bytecode than in native
> code. Is there a good reason for that or is it a bug ?
> Note : It is a (way too, I know) naive implementation of the well known
> string suite 1, 11, 21, 1211, 111221, ...
>
> Benjamin Canou.
>
> === code ===
>
> let list_of_string s =
> let rec list_of_string s i =
> try s.[i] :: list_of_string s (succ i)
> with _ -> []
> in list_of_string s 0
>
> let rec trans = function
> | '1' :: '1' :: '1' :: tl -> "31" ^ trans tl
> | '1' :: '1' :: tl -> "21" ^ trans tl
> | '1' :: tl -> "11" ^ trans tl
> | '2' :: '2' :: '2' :: tl -> "32" ^ trans tl
> | '2' :: '2' :: tl -> "22" ^ trans tl
> | '2' :: tl -> "12" ^ trans tl
> | '3' :: '3' :: '3' :: tl -> "33" ^ trans tl
> | '3' :: '3' :: tl -> "23" ^ trans tl
> | '3' :: tl -> "13" ^ trans tl
> | [] -> ""
> | _ -> failwith "bad input"
>
> let rec print n s =
> print_endline s ;
> if n > 0 then print (pred n) (trans (list_of_string s))
>
> let _ = print 30 "1"
>
> === perfs ===
>
> benjamin@benjamin-laptop:~/Work/Stuff$ ocamlopt 123.ml -o 123
> benjamin@benjamin-laptop:~/Work/Stuff$ time ./123
> [...]
> real 0m5.245s
> user 0m4.944s
> sys 0m0.016s
> benjamin@benjamin-laptop:~/Work/Stuff$ ocamlc 123.ml -o 123
> benjamin@benjamin-laptop:~/Work/Stuff$ time ./123
> [...]
> real 0m1.097s
> user 0m0.840s
> sys 0m0.008s
> benjamin@benjamin-laptop:~/Work/Stuff$ ocaml -version
> The Objective Caml toplevel, version 3.09.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-18 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 1:32 Benjamin Canou
2008-01-18 2:15 ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2008-01-18 2:28 ` [Caml-list] " Jacques Garrigue
2008-01-18 7:39 ` Till Varoquaux
2008-01-18 9:12 ` Jacques Garrigue
2008-01-18 16:55 ` Benjamin Canou
2008-01-18 17:05 ` Olivier Andrieu
2008-01-18 17:11 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-18 17:43 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-18 19:53 ` Benjamin Canou
2008-01-18 16:55 ` Edgar Friendly
2008-01-18 17:52 ` Kuba Ober
2008-01-18 17:56 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-19 2:32 ` Jacques Garrigue
2008-01-24 22:52 ` Christophe Raffalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080118.111503.185813743.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
--to=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
--cc=benjamin.canou@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox