From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DEFBC6B for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:23:28 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAACoYh0fVJFBblmdsb2JhbACQHgEBAQEHBAYiB5l1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,272,1196636400"; d="scan'208";a="21132598" Received: from mx-out.libertysurf.net (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) ([213.36.80.91]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2008 16:23:28 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (88.123.241.40) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.3.118.8) id 4786726D0004A2B3; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:23:46 +0100 From: Florent Monnier To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why is ocaml so big? Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:24:38 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200801111239.05507.giles@spacepigs.com> In-Reply-To: <200801111239.05507.giles@spacepigs.com> Organization: l'Association Linux-Nantes Cc: Giles Constant X-Face: -0"dKXwF0PiXr]fa$^)NJY7$;waqUckGcM7&q,VU?Xv\[=CiVM]g]pDs^xmfU9+Q=Z,OdfMHUR-7Ao%evJh.=aiq,#r0Ux0dm'!l|zeAXj||$>1_(Lv4Hc",&F}sbHeK0`SBA$_|XP MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801111624.38908.fmonnier@linux-nantes.fr.eu.org> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocamlopt:01 bytecode:01 ocamlc:01 caml-list:01 native:03 compiled:04 problem:05 version:13 but:14 code:17 hello:17 result:17 possible:17 would:18 Hi Giles, I understand your problem, I don't know if it is possible to make a custom version of ocamlopt, but one thing you could do would be to switch from native code to bytecode. A "hello world" compiled with ocamlc gives a result of 12K. -- Regards