From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D6DBC6B for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:23:14 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4HAKR1hEdDWxLC/2dsb2JhbACBV6gq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,263,1196636400"; d="scan'208";a="5874168" Received: from ip67-91-18-194.z18-91-67.customer.algx.net (HELO server1.bertec.net) ([67.91.18.194]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2008 16:23:13 +0100 Received: from kuba.bertec.net (kuba.bertec.net [192.168.2.16]) by server1.bertec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBAA105830 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:23:12 -0500 (EST) From: Kuba Ober To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: ocaml doesn't need to optimize on amd64?? Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:22:00 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20071123.740460) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801090922.00231.ober.14@osu.edu> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 gcc:01 cheers:01 osu:07 benchmarks:07 bit:11 bit:11 doesn't:12 doesn't:12 optimize:12 think:13 mode:13 mode:13 does:14 Jon & al, why do you think that OCaml doesn't need to do certain optimizations on amd64? Or does it apply only to 64 bit mode? I run my benchmarks on amd64 (in 32 bit mode) and OCaml is worse off than gcc. Cheers, Kuba