From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E30ABC69 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:18:23 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAANdakdDWxLC/2dsb2JhbACBV6h4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,191,1196636400"; d="scan'208";a="5890896" Received: from ip67-91-18-194.z18-91-67.customer.algx.net (HELO server1.bertec.net) ([67.91.18.194]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2007 21:18:23 +0100 Received: from kuba.bertec.net (kuba.bertec.net [192.168.2.16]) by server1.bertec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589FACDFA5 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:18:21 -0500 (EST) From: Kuba Ober To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: MinGW port w/o Cygwin? Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:18:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20071012.724442) References: <200712200930.29585.ober.14@osu.edu> <87sl1xgzkp.fsf@pps.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <87sl1xgzkp.fsf@pps.jussieu.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200712201518.20487.ober.14@osu.edu> X-Spam: no; 0.00; mingw:01 cygwin:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 compilation:01 mingw:01 cygwin:01 cheers:01 2007,:98 wrote:01 maintainers:01 caml-list:01 fyi:02 guess:04 osu:07 On Thursday 20 December 2007, Zheng Li wrote: > FYI, http://d2bg.nfshost.com/lang/ocaml/ocaml.compilation.with.mingw Tried it and sure enough - it works!!! (On an XP machine that never saw Cygwin either). That's *extremely* good news to me. I guess that Ocaml maintainers should just drop that Cygwin requirement, and tweak their build process to work "out of the box" with MSYS/MinGW. Cheers, Kuba