From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE21BC6B for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:31:00 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4HAG94SUfUnw6FdWdsb2JhbACCOY0GAQoEBg8TB4EP X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,464,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4589049" Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net ([212.159.14.133]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Nov 2007 22:31:00 +0100 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1IwP47-00032u-84 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:30:59 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Smoke on 3.09.2 Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:22:15 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <47471716.3020304@irisa.fr> <200711252048.31111.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <200711252220.49791.san.vu-ngoc@univ-rennes1.fr> In-Reply-To: <200711252220.49791.san.vu-ngoc@univ-rennes1.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711252122.15677.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 experimented:01 lablgl:01 smoke:98 20,:98 shim:98 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 checking:02 opengl:03 hmm:04 guess:04 problem:05 quite:08 On Sunday 25 November 2007 21:20, Vu Ngoc San wrote: > I guess yet. compiz (except when running another opengl application; they > don't mix well). Also, I play armagetronad quite a bit :-) > And of course, my own small ocaml software... Hmm, ok. And is it particularly resizing windows that causes the problem? > Have you experimented with glcaml ? I was tempted to give it a try. Not yet but it looks extremely promising. A shim that provided stronger type checking (as LablGL does) would be very useful. Does glcaml support GLU? -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e