From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E49BC69 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:20:54 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAAj4Q0dQRFuw/2dsb2JhbAA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,447,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4756333" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2007 18:20:53 +0100 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1IutFp-0004vi-00; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:20:49 +0000 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:20:49 +0000 To: Mike Hogan Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCalm on Sony PS3 (was Re: More registers in modern day CPUs) Message-ID: <20071121172049.GB17695@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <875c7e070709060755r1d0d099ds30a25ea78d0fd85a@mail.gmail.com> <46E01A27.1070207@janestcapital.com> <509223F0BF55E74FA1247D17207E7A0C01D75893@orsmsx419.amr.corp.intel.com> <87r6lb90tw.fsf@linux-france.org> <46E046DF.5010103@univ-savoie.fr> <46E04B85.1020004@naughtydog.com> <13858952.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13858952.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Richard Jones X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 sony:98 20,:98 dog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 yellow:97 native:03 seems:03 compiled:04 bits:05 tue:06 linux:07 On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:32:34AM -0800, Mike Hogan wrote: > I have recently compiled OCaml 3.10 for the PS3 running Yellow Dog Linux. > Seems to work fine, but I haven't tested it rigorously (and at this point, I > wouldn't even know how to test it ... um ...what's the opposite of > "rigorously"? ... non-rigorously?) Native compiler? 64 bits?? Which version of OCaml??? Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat