From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81D6BC6B for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 20:47:34 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAJrJKUdC+VLolmdsb2JhbACOaAEBAQEHBAYREQdSPQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,359,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="18843781" Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.232]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2007 20:47:33 +0100 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h27so524035wxd for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:47:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=vq59aBqwyDqz/nE4DV/NZgdU3xsJDb0zzOwOAWaxD18=; b=QpqGa2vq6oz4QnQpLjfcMt6wCm1GnDDnj6wXBqWUHYaIhdh6AUlmGfXoNHNcBDYmyP/9/K03UAt70rbw/8SizGtPC4uGMMFs2YeBjNPywjBtzpOT26H1hBGRoonA/z8NDsV7SPbbdqkipXcJRcZnhe5yCOFVLRRZiw9PI8W5G8c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Zg2/RN/qAMG4zCfrjpwcyjctcJQTtaVuOpz8dl761XM2E9+l9fVTCuvbPz4DkW4AZIIQOSbfZ6taVULLLoWr/ED7pCR5WZlcKpkXcXMxWyolCTngbNgZzj9i1ZtaEOfw/EkpzAndFpwqOKRSKfDj9UpFyBtLmZkriv7Jyeuhi3c= Received: by 10.90.101.19 with SMTP id y19mr747707agb.1193946452446; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tama-chan ( [24.98.134.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 36sm3598408aga.2007.11.01.12.47.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:47:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Peng Zang Reply-To: peng.zang@gmail.com To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Google trends Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:47:27 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200711010102.39348.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <200711011631.35443.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20071101181240.GB28124@furbychan.cocan.org> In-Reply-To: <20071101181240.GB28124@furbychan.cocan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711011547.29844.peng.zang@gmail.com> X-Spam: no; 0.00; hash:01 peng:98 peng:98 nail:98 embrace:98 embrace:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 gnu:03 message-----:05 pgp:05 pgp:05 linux:07 extend:07 extend:07 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 See, that hits the nail exactly for me. It does sound like embrace and extend. How many times has MS used this strategy before? Do we ever learn? Peng On Thursday 01 November 2007 14:12, Richard Jones wrote: > Sorry, not seeing the advantage yet. Sounds to me more like embrace > and extend. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHKi1RfIRcEFL/JewRAlCQAJ9lMqPGnMOS+I7NwV+0BnK0RCqMdwCgstqo ngB4off2rLRRdtPFdrmi8DM= =eyvI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----