From: Christian Stork <caml-list@cstork.org>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:55:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070922235523.GA30589@stirner.roentgeninstitut.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1F2549D4-C19C-42DC-9855-A8387459336D@epfl.ch>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 05:43:54PM +0200, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
>
> Le 22 sept. 07 à 17:22, Nicolas Pouillard a écrit :
>
> >The old and deprecated `&' operator do perfectly the job.
> >Indeed the OCaml
> >`&' operator have the associativity and a precedence close to the
> >Haskell `$'
> >than what can do the OCaml `$'.
>
> The problem is that jocaml recycles it.
Not only that, but why not strive for compatibility with F#'s operators?
The F# developers thought this through and made reasonable choices,
afaict. Indeed is there any reason why one couldn't come up with a
camlp4 extension that emulates all of the operators that F# offers by
default?
--
Chris Stork <> Support eff.org! <> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~cstork/
OpenPGP fingerprint: B08B 602C C806 C492 D069 021E 41F3 8C8D 50F9 CA2F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-22 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-20 14:39 Aaron Bohannon
2007-09-22 15:22 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-09-22 15:43 ` Daniel Bünzli
2007-09-22 23:55 ` Christian Stork [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-17 14:36 Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-17 18:59 ` [Caml-list] " Eric Cooper
2007-09-17 19:45 ` Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-17 22:24 ` Julien Moutinho
2007-09-18 5:39 ` Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-18 8:53 ` Julien Moutinho
2007-09-18 9:09 ` Julien Moutinho
2007-09-18 14:12 ` Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-18 16:42 ` Jon Harrop
2007-09-18 20:41 ` skaller
2007-09-19 19:49 ` Fabrice Marchant
2007-09-19 21:56 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2007-09-20 13:42 ` Ashish Agarwal
2007-09-20 18:37 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2007-09-21 20:58 ` Harrison, John R
2007-09-21 21:44 ` Karl Zilles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070922235523.GA30589@stirner.roentgeninstitut.de \
--to=caml-list@cstork.org \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox