From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] More registers in modern day CPUs
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 21:48:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070906204808.GC10798@furbychan.cocan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875c7e070709060755r1d0d099ds30a25ea78d0fd85a@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:55:20AM -0400, Chris King wrote:
> On 9/6/07, Tom <tom.primozic@gmail.com> wrote:
> > However, would it be possible to "emulate" cpu registers using software? By
> > keeping registers in the main memory, but accessing them often enough to
> > keep them in primary cache? That would be quite fast I believe...
>
> This makes me wonder... why have registers to begin with? I wonder
> how feasible a chip with a, say, 256-byte "register-level" cache would
The 6502 was a successful 8-bit processor where the "on chip"
registers were very few, but the first part of RAM acted as memory
mapped registers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6502
This is not feasible in current chips for a whole variety of reasons,
starting with the fact that current RAM is hundreds of times slower
than registers (and even L1 cache is 4-8 times slower).
You should read "Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach" by
Hennessy & Patterson.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-06 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-06 6:20 Tom
2007-09-06 7:17 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2007-09-06 9:07 ` Richard Jones
2007-09-06 14:55 ` Chris King
2007-09-06 15:17 ` Brian Hurt
2007-09-06 15:54 ` Harrison, John R
2007-09-06 17:10 ` David MENTRE
2007-09-06 18:27 ` Harrison, John R
2007-09-06 18:28 ` Christophe Raffalli
2007-09-06 18:48 ` Brian Hurt
2007-09-06 18:48 ` Pal-Kristian Engstad
2007-11-20 15:32 ` [Caml-list] OCalm on Sony PS3 (was Re: More registers in modern day CPUs) Mike Hogan
2007-11-21 17:20 ` Richard Jones
2007-11-21 19:05 ` [Caml-list] OCaml " Mike Hogan
2007-11-23 6:44 ` Mike Hogan
2007-12-02 10:14 ` [Caml-list] OCalm " Xavier Leroy
2007-12-02 16:22 ` Mike Hogan
2007-12-02 22:19 ` Konrad Meyer
2007-12-03 0:09 ` [Caml-list] OCaml " Mike Hogan
2007-12-03 20:16 ` minithread (was OCaml on Sony PS3) Christophe Raffalli
2007-12-04 14:25 ` [Caml-list] " David MENTRE
2007-12-04 14:37 ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2007-12-04 16:25 ` Mattias Engdegård
2007-12-04 17:33 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2007-12-04 18:00 ` Mike Hogan
2007-12-04 2:29 ` [Caml-list] OCalm on Sony PS3 (was Re: More registers in modern day CPUs) Gordon Henriksen
2007-09-06 20:48 ` Richard Jones [this message]
[not found] ` <20070906204524.GB10798@furbychan.cocan.org>
2007-09-06 20:59 ` [Caml-list] More registers in modern day CPUs Chris King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070906204808.GC10798@furbychan.cocan.org \
--to=rich@annexia.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox