From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE5DBC69 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l7OJ46mx014045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:04:08 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1IOeRv-0004pt-RS for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:04:03 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] big_int -> int64 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:53:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <6806cf750708240727l7ad05991td11ad9c4719f977f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6806cf750708240727l7ad05991td11ad9c4719f977f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708241953.03342.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 46CF2BA6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 wrote:01 ints:01 caml-list:01 int:01 int:01 match:02 string:02 string:02 pattern:04 guess:04 ltd:87 products:86 On Friday 24 August 2007 15:27:14 Jeff Meister wrote: > I guess you do Int64.of_string (Big_int.string_of_big_int i). Clunky, > but should work. You could go via Num and pattern match for Int to catch the most common case of small 31- or 63-bit ints. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?e