From: Julien Moutinho <julien.moutinho@gmail.com>
To: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Stupid question re:modules
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:31:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070824043102.GA3299@jiyu.gnu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708232023160.12703@localhost>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:32:22PM -0400, Brian Hurt wrote:
>
> I should just know this. So let's say I have two module types defined:
>
> module type Foo = sig
> type 'a t
> val foo : 'a -> 'a t
> end;;
>
> module type Bar = sig
> type 'a t
> val bar : 'a -> 'a t
> end;;
>
> Now, I want to define a module that is both a Foo and a Bar without cutting
> and pasting the module definitions around. I've been trying to do:
>
> module Baz : sig
> type 'a baz
> include Foo with type 'a t = 'a baz
> include Bar with type 'a t = 'a baz
> end;;
>
> but this blows up on the Bar line (multiple definitions of 'a t).
>
> There is a solution to this, I'm just being stupid and forgetting what it
> is. Hints would be appreciated.
>
> Brian
I might haven't got exactly what you want,
but, with control over Foo and Bar,
and starting from the structure,
I would have written :
module type Foo =
functor (T: T) ->
sig val foo : 'a -> 'a T.t end
module type Bar =
functor (T: T) ->
sig val bar : 'a -> 'a T.t end
module Baz =
functor (T: T) ->
functor (Foo: Foo) ->
functor (Bar: Bar) ->
struct
include T
type 'a baz = 'a t
module Foo = Foo(T)
module Bar = Bar(T)
include Foo
include Bar
end
Then I would have generated the signature automatically with -i.
But if you really want a short .mli without redundancy,
I see no solution, even for the above functorized code.
Because :
1/ unable to override or delete elements from a signature
2/ unable to get the signature of a structure
from a functor in a signature.
I mean, given this :
module type T = sig end
module type F =
functor (T: T) ->
sig end
This signature does not work :
module B :
functor (T: T) ->
functor (F: F) ->
sig module M : F(T) end
nor this :
module B :
functor (T: T) ->
functor (M: F(T)) ->
sig end
nor this :
module B :
functor (T: T) ->
functor (F: F) ->
sig include F(T) end
nor this :
module B :
functor (T: T) ->
functor (F: F) ->
sig open F(T) end
Despite the fact that the structured version of
the first two signatures work.
And that I do not understand why they all do not work,
since it's a kind of substitution, isn't it?
Anyway, hope you'll find a way to _avoid_ your problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-24 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-24 0:32 Brian Hurt
2007-08-24 2:56 ` [Caml-list] " Jacques Garrigue
2007-08-24 4:31 ` Julien Moutinho [this message]
2007-08-24 10:16 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2007-09-23 9:37 ` David Teller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070824043102.GA3299@jiyu.gnu \
--to=julien.moutinho@gmail.com \
--cc=bhurt@spnz.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox