From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
To: David Allsopp <dra-news@metastack.com>
Cc: "'Caml-list List'" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] If OCaml were a car
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:33:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070821183335.GA32626@furbychan.cocan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005a01c7e3ca$0ce14fa0$6a7ba8c0@treble>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:05:33AM +0100, David Allsopp wrote:
> (* first function *)
> let f x = (* definition of f *)
> in
> let g x = (* definition of g *)
> (* etc, etc *)
>
> (* next function *)
> let h x = (* definition of *)
>
> Here, O'Caml helpfully tells me that there's a syntax error on line 7 which
> is of course complete rubbish!! It may be easy to spot here, but I've
> absent-mindedly missed the final part of a bigger function mid-development
I find that using tuareg-mode (an Emacs mode for OCaml) generally
avoids this problem.
[...]
> I'd go one further - and recommend that all top level statements are
> function definitions (there's so rarely a need to use global "variables"...
> it usually comes back to bite you at some point later). Then define a
No I use top level "variables" all the time. It depends what sort of
program you're writing, but for once-through command-line programs you
will often do things like:
let dbname = (* something involving Sys.argv *) ;;
let dbh = PGOCaml.connect ~dbname () ;;
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-21 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-18 19:21 Richard Jones
2007-08-18 20:24 ` [Caml-list] " Jeff Meister
2007-08-18 21:32 ` Michael Vanier
2007-08-19 11:50 ` Daniel Bünzli
2007-08-19 11:59 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-08-22 5:50 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-08-22 8:13 ` Jon Harrop
2007-08-22 9:20 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-08-24 2:54 ` Nathaniel Gray
2007-08-25 19:45 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-08-19 14:43 ` John Carr
2007-08-19 16:22 ` brogoff
2007-08-19 17:07 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-19 17:19 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2007-08-22 6:04 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-08-19 20:51 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-08-21 8:05 ` David Allsopp
2007-08-21 18:33 ` Richard Jones [this message]
2007-08-19 20:30 ` Tom
2007-08-19 21:45 ` skaller
2007-08-20 3:37 ` Jon Harrop
2007-08-20 6:26 ` skaller
2007-08-20 10:00 ` Joerg van den Hoff
2007-08-21 12:03 ` Florian Hars
2007-08-20 6:54 ` skaller
2007-08-20 19:54 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-08-20 20:27 ` David Allsopp
2007-08-20 20:50 ` Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
2007-08-21 10:56 ` Joerg van den Hoff
2007-08-20 21:13 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-08-21 0:47 ` skaller
2007-08-21 9:51 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-08-21 10:30 ` skaller
2007-08-21 18:57 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-22 2:49 ` skaller
2007-08-22 11:33 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2007-08-21 14:46 ` Business Adoption of Ocaml [was Re: [Caml-list] If OCaml were a car] Robert Fischer
2007-08-21 15:09 ` Brian Hurt
2007-08-21 15:48 ` [Caml-list] If OCaml were a car brogoff
2007-08-19 18:15 [caml-list] " Mike Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070821183335.GA32626@furbychan.cocan.org \
--to=rich@annexia.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=dra-news@metastack.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox