From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9E6BC69 for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 11:31:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net (pih-relay05.plus.net [212.159.14.132]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4U9VGmP006089 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 11:31:17 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1HtKWQ-0007px-WC for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Wed, 30 May 2007 10:31:16 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Faking concurrency using Unix forks and pipes Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:25:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200705300442.59906.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20070530191008.4e26e70b.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> <20070530192508.e1b96163.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> In-Reply-To: <20070530192508.e1b96163.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705301025.42208.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 465D4464.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; forks:01 jocaml:01 tarball:01 jocaml:01 bytecode:01 tarball:01 dependencies:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 outrageous:98 smoke:98 frog:98 luc:01 unix:01 wrote:01 On Wednesday 30 May 2007 10:25:08 Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > The much incomplete web site is at > > > > > > > Now that *really* *does* look interesting! > > I tried to grab the source tarball, but got a 404 not found :-(. > > Patience Erik, patience! This is outrageous. We could have had JoCaml by now if Luc hadn't been posting on mailing lists. I'm shocked and appalled... By the way, apologies to the ten people who downloaded my original bytecode tarball of Smoke that had dependencies on other code that wasn't there. It should all be fixed now. Why does nobody ever tell me whether or not my demos work?! :-) -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?e