From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11B3BC0A for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:21:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4N9LVLA015273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:21:32 +0200 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from first (dslb-088-073-124-097.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.73.124.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id l4N9LVG6003478 for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:21:31 +0200 Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 501) id 34E4E3CB2C2; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:21:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:21:19 +0200 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Book sales Message-ID: <20070523092119.GA335@first.in-berlin.de> References: <200705230054.11816.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20070523002052.GA463@first.in-berlin.de> <2D44D10F-4B92-42A0-8851-DC25A9B77BDA@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2D44D10F-4B92-42A0-8851-DC25A9B77BDA@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4654079B.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 imho:01 oliver:01 oliver:01 caml-list:01 contrast:03 library:03 notion:04 purchased:94 i'd:05 tue:06 On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:47:06PM -0700, Paul Snively wrote: > Since we seem to be airing our opinions here, I'd like to take the > opportunity to add mine. > > I purchased Jon Harrop's book, am glad that I did, I didn't say the book is a bad one. It was to expensive for me, so I asked a local university library to buy it. So I could read it. Yes, I like the book also. And it's ok to mention it. But if it's mentioned in nearly every mail, then it's obssessive and might annoy the reader, who is here to read about OCaml. Reading about OCaml in commercial applications is interesting for me, but thies IMHO does not include books (as commercial products) about the language. [...] > By contrast, Dr. Harrop's critics seem to take issue with the notion > that Dr. Harrop might actually make a profit, either directly or > indirectly, from this. Nonsense. > While I appreciate that the list is primarily > a mutual information-sharing resource, I have difficulty seeing > anything wrong with periodically informing people that there is at > least one commercial resource available for those such as myself who > desire it. [...] It can be put on webpages with links to OCaml-references, and I think it already is. When I google with "books on OCaml" it's on the first result page and one of the first links also. So, it would be fine if these mail-based advertising pop-ups could be abandoned. They are unnecessary and also annoying. > In any case, for those who feel that way, it would seem > that the simple solution of filtering Dr. Harrop's messages would be > sufficient recourse. This is no option, because Jon's answers often are also well informing. But the advertising is nevertheless annoying. Ciao, Oliver