From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A14BC69 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:43:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3TFhvM8012003 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:43:57 +0200 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from first (dslb-088-073-085-152.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.73.85.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id l3TFhutk006255 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:43:56 +0200 Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 501) id E50C73AEABD; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:43:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:43:53 +0200 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] mboxlib reloaded ;-) Message-ID: <20070429154353.GB547@first.in-berlin.de> References: <20070427135425.GA1161@first.in-berlin.de> <20070427162911.GA10099@furbychan.cocan.org> <20070427231220.GA1507@first.in-berlin.de> <20070428075627.GA21610@furbychan.cocan.org> <20070428105815.GB363@first.in-berlin.de> <20070429103911.GA30510@furbychan.cocan.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070429103911.GA30510@furbychan.cocan.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4634BD3D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 reloaded:01 0100,:01 0200,:01 bandel:01 0100,:01 0200,:01 threading:01 threading:01 28,:98 28,:98 disease:98 rot:98 wrote:01 On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:39:11AM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:58:16PM +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 08:56:28AM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 01:12:20AM +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 05:29:11PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > > > > The source for COCANWIKI[1] contains extensive support for threading > > > > > of mail messages, based on JWZ's algorithm: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html > > > > > > > > Nice... you speak of an optimized algorithm for threading. > > > > I didn't explored your solution nor did I explored your > > > > paper in detail (tomorrow I think I have the time to do it), > > > > > > I should point out that the algorithm is due to esteemed hacker[1] > > > Jamie Zawinski (http://jwz.org) who used it in Netscape versions 1 > > > through 3. They got C++/OO group-think disease from Netscape 4 and > > > above (the rot continues to this day). > > > > When I think about netscape, I think about the terrible way, > > how it handles newsgroups.... > > ...when doing a resort of the newsgroup-entries it's extremely slow. > > That's my point - Netscape <= 3 was very fast. > Ah, oh,OK, I see.... you wrote versions 1 through 3 were fast, and these versions used the algorithm you talked about... right? Ciao, Oliver