From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] mboxlib reloaded ;-)
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:43:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070429154353.GB547@first.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070429103911.GA30510@furbychan.cocan.org>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:39:11AM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:58:16PM +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 08:56:28AM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 01:12:20AM +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 05:29:11PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > > > > The source for COCANWIKI[1] contains extensive support for threading
> > > > > of mail messages, based on JWZ's algorithm:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html
> > > >
> > > > Nice... you speak of an optimized algorithm for threading.
> > > > I didn't explored your solution nor did I explored your
> > > > paper in detail (tomorrow I think I have the time to do it),
> > >
> > > I should point out that the algorithm is due to esteemed hacker[1]
> > > Jamie Zawinski (http://jwz.org) who used it in Netscape versions 1
> > > through 3. They got C++/OO group-think disease from Netscape 4 and
> > > above (the rot continues to this day).
> >
> > When I think about netscape, I think about the terrible way,
> > how it handles newsgroups....
> > ...when doing a resort of the newsgroup-entries it's extremely slow.
>
> That's my point - Netscape <= 3 was very fast.
>
Ah, oh,OK, I see.... you wrote versions 1 through 3 were fast,
and these versions used the algorithm you talked about...
right?
Ciao,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-29 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-27 13:54 Oliver Bandel
2007-04-27 16:29 ` [Caml-list] " Richard Jones
2007-04-27 23:12 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-04-28 0:54 ` skaller
2007-04-28 10:47 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-04-28 10:54 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2007-04-28 11:44 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-04-28 13:49 ` skaller
2007-04-28 14:18 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-04-29 10:45 ` Richard Jones
2007-04-29 15:41 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-04-29 18:51 ` Robert Roessler
2007-05-01 11:00 ` camomile-problem (Re: [Caml-list] mboxlib reloaded ;-)) Oliver Bandel
2007-05-01 10:56 ` [Caml-list] mboxlib reloaded ;-) Oliver Bandel
2007-04-28 7:56 ` Richard Jones
2007-04-28 10:58 ` Oliver Bandel
[not found] ` <20070429103911.GA30510@furbychan.cocan.org>
2007-04-29 15:43 ` Oliver Bandel [this message]
2007-09-24 18:22 ` ocamllex speed [was Re: [Caml-list] mboxlib reloaded ;-)] Bruno De Fraine
2007-09-24 19:54 ` Alain Frisch
2007-09-25 8:53 ` Bruno De Fraine
2007-09-24 22:06 ` skaller
2007-09-27 5:26 ` Chris King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070429154353.GB547@first.in-berlin.de \
--to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox