From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2ABBC69 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:17:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3CKHeZS026056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:17:40 +0200 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from first (dslb-088-073-066-231.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.73.66.231]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id l3CKHdMG013642 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:17:39 +0200 Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 501) id 18B293A6F2C; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:17:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:17:36 +0200 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Other Digests than md5? Message-ID: <20070412201736.GA925@first.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 461E93E4.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 imho:01 oliver:01 oliver:01 algorithms:03 inria:06 ciao:11 but:14 add:14 add:14 U4:82 hello:17 would:18 really:19 Hello, is it planned in INRIA, to add other hash-algorithms/Digests than md5? The md5-module is really fine, but to have SHA-1 and other algorithms also in the standard-lib would be a good thing, IMHO. Is it planned to add? Ciao, Oliver