From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Symbolic computation
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 08:00:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701030800.24255.jon@ffconsultancy.com> (raw)
I've just updated our Benefits of OCaml page with a more elegant symbolic
computation example:
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/free/ocaml/symbolic.html
In particular, results are composed using a pair of non-trivial constructors
that perform simple simplifications:
# let rec ( +: ) f g = match f, g with
| Int n, Int m -> Int (n + m)
| Int 0, f | f, Int 0 -> f
| f, Add(g, h) -> f +: g +: h
| f, g when f > g -> g +: f
| f, g -> Add(f, g)
and ( *: ) f g = match f, g with
| Int n, Int m -> Int (n * m)
| Int 0, _ | _, Int 0 -> Int 0
| Int 1, f | f, Int 1 -> f
| f, Mul(g, h) -> f *: g *: h
| f, g when f > g -> g *: f
| f, g -> Mul(f, g);;
val ( +: ) : expr -> expr -> expr = <fun>
val ( *: ) : expr -> expr -> expr = <fun>
I'm also translating this into F# for my forthcoming book "F# for Scientists".
Even on an example as simple as this, F# has some significant benefits:
1. + and * can be overloaded for the expr type.
2. User-defined types can have their own comparison functions.
3. Set and Map are polymorphic (not functors).
Hopefully F#'s active patterns will also allow operators in patterns, allowing
code like:
let d f x = match f with
| Var v when x=v -> Int 1
| Int _ | Var _ -> Int 0
| f + g -> d f x + d g x
| f * g -> f * d g x + g * d f x
and:
| f + (g + h) -> (f + g) + h
and so on.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists
reply other threads:[~2007-01-03 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200701030800.24255.jon@ffconsultancy.com \
--to=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox