From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9ACFBC0B for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:45:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from furbychan.cocan.org (furbychan.cocan.org [80.68.91.176]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBT9jesf012350 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:45:44 +0100 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1H0EIC-0000cy-00; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:44:48 +0000 Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:44:48 +0000 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Qu=F4c?= Peyrot Cc: ocaml_beginners@yahoogroups.com, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] compiling wxocaml (and wxhaskell) Message-ID: <20061229094447.GA1845@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <6ACFD6F8-754C-4631-8C11-C8889BE144A9@lrde.epita.fr> <20061229095241.1305d379.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4594E3C4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 wxwindows:01 bindings:01 ocaml:01 bindings:01 lablgtk:01 platform's:01 28,:98 28,:98 despair:98 blog:98 blog:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 03:48:46PM -0800, Quôc Peyrot wrote: > On Dec 28, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >Quôc Peyrot wrote: > > > >>Hello, > >> > >>I was trying to find a good portable GUI library for my ocaml > >>projects. > >>A natural choice seemed to be wxwindows/wxWidgets since I wanted > >>to have a native look'n feel and QT doesn't have any bindings in > >>OCaml > >>(to my despair... anyone working on QT bindings?) > > > >Have you looked at lablgtk? I find it up to date and easy to use. > > Yes I have and it was ok, but it doesn't use native platform's controls. I haven't really looked at this in a long time, but perhaps take a look at our cross-platform experiments here: http://merjis.com/developers/xphelloworld The basic controls look native (although they are not), but things like file & print dialogs will of course be completely different. However complete disregard for consistency never seemed to prevent Microsoft from releasing Office with custom controls, so ... Rich. -- Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd. Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com Internet Marketing and AdWords courses - http://merjis.com/courses - NEW! Merjis blog - http://blog.merjis.com - NEW!