From: luc.maranget@inria.fr (Luc Maranget)
To: Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@univ-savoie.fr>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] is this a bug ?
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:33:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060509133323.GA32191@yquem.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44609473.6030004@univ-savoie.fr>
>
> hello,
>
> --------------------------------
> let f b l = match l with
> [] | [_] -> 1
> | [a;_] | [_;a] when a = b-> 2
^^^^
> | _ -> 3
Warning U: this pattern is unused.
>
> let _ =
> print_int (f 1 [1;2]);
> print_int (f 1 [2;1]);
> print_newline ()
> --------------------------------
23
>
> Do you think this code should have a useless pattern warning and print "23"
> instead of "22" ?
>
> If someone tell me this is a bug then I fill a bug report ...
>
You may object the semantics, but it is consitent w.r.t. both
documentation (deterministic left-to-right matching of or-patterns,
semantics of when as match first, then test)
and supplied warning (which you omit).
So I am tempted to say not a bug.
However, there is indeed a difficulty, if we expand or-pat as:
let f b l = match l with
| [] -> 1
| [_] -> 1
| [a;_] when a = b -> 2
| [_;a] when a = b -> 2
| _ -> 3
Then, we have the other behavior (no warning, 22).
Oups, another oddity of 'when...'
--Luc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-09 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-09 13:09 Christophe Raffalli
2006-05-09 13:16 ` [Caml-list] " Remi Vanicat
2006-05-09 13:19 ` Samuel Mimram
2006-05-09 13:26 ` Christophe Raffalli
2006-05-09 13:33 ` Samuel Mimram
2006-05-09 13:30 ` Yoann Padioleau
2006-05-09 13:22 ` Christophe Raffalli
2006-05-09 13:33 ` Luc Maranget [this message]
2006-05-09 13:47 ` Arne Ehrlich
2006-05-09 18:24 ` Jonathan Roewen
2006-05-09 13:47 ` Alain Frisch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-01 12:59 Is this a bug? Thomas Fischbacher
2007-05-01 13:34 ` [Caml-list] " Eric Cooper
2007-05-02 0:25 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-05-02 0:50 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2007-05-02 2:40 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2002-07-08 19:53 [Caml-list] productivity improvement Oleg
2002-07-10 15:39 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-12 12:16 ` [Caml-list] Is this a bug? John Max Skaller
2002-07-12 14:05 ` Xavier Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060509133323.GA32191@yquem.inria.fr \
--to=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=christophe.raffalli@univ-savoie.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox